Cellular glass is smart

logo_smallIf we put a compressive stress on cellular glass, we would expect random phenomena of breaking cells. With piezo-electric sensors on the material, we are able to registrate these breaking cells, because they all emit acoustic waves in the structure. This measurement technique is acoustic emission and it is used to study the behaviour of steel welds, rocks, concrete, … . In that way, we can check whether the phenomena are random or not.

But in the case of many heterogeneous brittle materials, the distribution of amplitudes of these waves show a power law correlation. A Physical Review paper shows that this is also the case for cellular glass like it happens also for earthquakes. In the latter case, we speak about the Richter-Gutenberg law. For earthquakes, there is also the Omori law for the time interval between the after shocks. This distribution is also a nice power law and it is also present in cellular glass over many decades from microseconds to several minutes. In region with many earthquakes, there is also another power law about the distribution of distance between the epicentra of consecutive earthquakes. These three power laws in magnitude, time and space domain have the same coefficients for cellular glass as the earthquakes around San Francisco.

It is clear that the breaking of cellular glass under a compressive load is not a random but instead a correlated process, which has a limited but not negligible predictability. And this predictability allows us to define a safety factor between the short time compressive strength (1 min) and the long term mechanical stability. For cellular glass, a safety factor 3 is generally accepted  and the above description is a method to prove that.

Solid glass has a much higher safety factor because one crack gives always complete failure while in the case of cellular glass, the interaction between the cells halts microcopic cracks inducing the low safety factor. This means that under a certain load under the safety factor, cellular glass does not not creep at all, while XPS, EPS, PIR, PUR and other foams always keep creeping and are never stable. This interaction between the brittle cells, as demonstrated with acoustic emission, gives cellular glass its perfect mechanical stability. Cellular glass is indeed smart …

1 thought on “Cellular glass is smart

  1. Pingback: On the mechanical stability of cellular glass | BELGLAS BVBA

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s